Toma de decisiones en la gestión sostenible del transporte: revisión bibliométrica de la literatura
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Introducción: Tradicionalmente, en la gestión del transporte, las decisiones se han tomado utilizando el análisis costo-beneficio para comparar diferentes alternativas. Sin embargo, este método no fue diseñado para contemplar las dimensiones de sostenibilidad. En este contexto, en los últimos años se han utilizado índices de sostenibilidad y el análisis multicriterio como alternativas.
Objetivo: Este artículo tiene como objetivo identificar las tendencias globales en los procesos de toma de decisiones en la gestión sostenible del transporte mediante una revisión bibliométrica de la producción científica.
Metodología: El artículo se desarrolló siguiendo cinco pasos metodológicos: i) búsqueda bibliográfica, ii) selección para inclusión, iii) extracción de datos, iv) selección de fuentes de datos y v) análisis de datos.
Resultados: Los resultados evidencian una dinámica significativa en la búsqueda de herramientas adecuadas para implementar los conceptos de desarrollo sostenible en la toma de decisiones, destacando especialmente la necesidad de considerar el contexto específico de las ciudades, la distribución espacial de los efectos y la participación de los actores involucrados.
Conclusiones: El estudio subraya la necesidad de integrar las dimensiones de sostenibilidad en los marcos de toma de decisiones en la gestión del transporte, con un enfoque en factores contextuales específicos y en la consideración de los actores involucrados para implementar de manera efectiva prácticas sostenibles.
Meinard Y, Tsoukiàs A. On the rationality of decision aiding processes. Eur J Oper Res [Internet]. 2019;273(3):1074-84. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.009
Marleau Donais F, Abi-Zeid I, Waygood EOD, Lavoie R. A review of cost-benefit analysis and multicriteria decision analysis from the perspective of sustainable transport in project evaluation. EURO Journal on Decision Processes. 1 de noviembre de 2019;7(3-4):327-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-019-00098-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-019-00098-1
Suprayoga GB, Bakker M, Witte P, Spit T. A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects. European Transport Research Review. 2020;12(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-0400-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-0400-6
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para los Asentamientos Humanos (ONU-Habitat). La nueva agenda urbana. Hábitat y Sociedad. 2020. 1-194 p. Disponible en: https://onu-habitat.org/images/Publicaciones/Nueva-Agenda-Urbana-Ilustrada.pdf.
Nguyen TT, Brunner H, Hirz M. Towards a Holistic Sustainability Evaluation for Transport Alternatives. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. 2020;9(4):1-12. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n4p1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n4p1
De Brucker K, MacHaris C, Verbeke A. Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. Eur J Oper Res [Internet]. 2013;224(1):122-31. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021
Munda G. Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. 2005; 233:953-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23
Yannis G, Kopsacheili A, Dragomanovits A, Petraki V. State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) [Internet]. 2020;7(4):413-31. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.05.005
Illahi U, Mir MS. Development of indices for sustainability of transportation systems: A review of state-of-the-art. Ecol Indic. noviembre de 2020;118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106760
Freudenberg M. Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers [Internet]. 2003; 16:35. Disponible en: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/composite-indicators-of-country-performance_405566708255.html
Bueno PC, Vassallo JM, Cheung K. Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods. 2015;1647. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1041435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1041435
Tao C Chung, Hung CC. A Comparative Approach of the Quantitative Models for Sustainable Transportation. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2003; 5:3329-44. Disponible en: https://easts.info/2003journal/papers/3329.pdf
Nikulina V, Simon D, Ny H, Baumann H. Context-adapted urban planning for rapid transitioning of personal mobility towards sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland). 15 de febrero de 2019;11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041007
Awasthi A, Omrani H, Gerber P. Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision-making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE. octubre de 2018; 116:247-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.007
Velasco Arevalo A, Gerike R. Sustainability evaluation methods for public transport with a focus on Latin American cities: A literature review. Int J Sustain Transp. 2023;17(11):1236-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2163208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2163208
Venter C, Leong WY. Workshop 6 report: Wider impacts of public transport and successful implementation of desirable and beneficial projects. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS. septiembre de 2018;69(SI):489-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.08.006
Templier M, Paré G. A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2015; 37:112-37. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03706
Zemigala M. Tendencies in research on sustainable development in management sciences. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2019; 218:796-809. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.009
Karner A. Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data. J Transp Geogr [Internet]. 2018;67(June 2017):24-32. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.005
Alogdianakis F, Dimitriou L. In-Depth Appraisal of Bus Transport Services for Sustainability Performance: A Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach. Transp Res Rec. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231190090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231190090
Pamučar D, Durán-Romero G, Yazdani M, López AM. A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1 de abril de 2023;86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101474
Lee DJ. A multi-criteria approach for prioritizing advanced public transport modes (APTM) considering urban types in Korea. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 1 de mayo de 2018; 111:148-61.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.005
Broniewicz E, Ogrodnik K. A comparative evaluation of multi-criteria analysis methods for sustainable transport. Energies (Basel). 2 de agosto de 2021;14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14165100
Goyal S, Agarwal S, Singh NSS, Mathur T, Mathur N. Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de noviembre de 2022;14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215110
Alkharabsheh A, Moslem S, Oubahman L, Duleba S. An integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making and grey theory for evaluating urban public transportation systems. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de marzo de 2021;13(5):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052740
Ortega J, Moslem S, Palaguachi J, Ortega M, Campisi T, Torrisi V. An integrated multi criteria decision-making model for evaluating park-and-ride facility location issue: A case study for cuenca city in Ecuador. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de julio de 2021;13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137461
Kalifa M, Özdemir A, Özkan A, Banar M. Application of Multi-Criteria Decision analysis including sustainable indicators for prioritization of public transport system. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 1 de enero de 2022;18(1):25-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4486
Damidavičius J, Burinskiene M, Antuchevičiene J. Assessing sustainable mobility measures applying multicriteria decision-making methods. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de agosto de 2020;12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156067
Kolak Oİ, Feyzioğlu O, Noyan N. Bi-level multi-objective traffic network optimisation with sustainability perspective. Expert Syst Appl. 15 de agosto de 2018; 104:294-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.034
Ueasin N. Decision-making on Public Transportation Services Based on the Socio-economic, Psychological, and Environmental Concern Factors. The Open Transportation Journal. 22 de abril de 2020;14(1):22-31. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802014010022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802014010022
Gutiérrez LR, De Vicente Oliva MA, Romero-Ania A. Economic, Ecological and Social Analysis Based on DEA and MCDA for the Management of the Madrid Urban Public Transportation System. Mathematics. 1 de enero de 2022;10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020172
Kundu P, Görçün ÖF, Garg CP, Küçükönder H, Çanakçıoğlu M. Evaluation of public transportation systems for sustainable cities using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making model. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03776-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03776-y
Munjal R, Liu W, Li X, Gutierrez J, Chong PHJ. Multi-Attribute Decision-making for Energy-Efficient Public Transport Network Selection in Smart Cities. Future Internet. 1 de febrero de 2022;14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14020042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14020042
Wołek M, Jagiełło A, Wolański M. Multi‐criteria analysis in the decision‐making process on the electrification of public transport in cities in poland: A case study analysis. Energies (Basel). 1 de octubre de 2021;14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196391
Turoń K. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis during Selection of Vehicles for Car-Sharing Services-Regular Users’ Expectations. Energies (Basel). 1 de octubre de 2022;15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197277
Cieśla M, Sobota A, Jacyna M. Multi-Criteria decision-making process in metropolitan transport means selection based on the sharing mobility idea. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de septiembre de 2020;12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177231
Romero-Ania A, Rivero Gutiérrez L, De Vicente Oliva MA. Multiple criteria decision analysis of sustainable urban public transport systems. Mathematics. 2 de agosto de 2021;9(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161844
Nalmpantis D, Roukouni A, Genitsaris E, Stamelou A, Naniopoulos A. Evaluation of innovative ideas for Public Transport proposed by citizens using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). European Transport Research Review. 1 de diciembre de 2019;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0356-6
dos Santos JB, Lima JP. Quality of public transportation based on the multi-criteria approach and from the perspective of user’s satisfaction level: A case study in a Brazilian city. Case Stud Transp Policy. septiembre de 2021;9(3):1233-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.015
Barfod MB. Supporting sustainable transport appraisals using stakeholder involvement and mcda. Transport. 2018;33(4):1052-66. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6596
Rivero Gutierrez L, De Vicente Oliva MA, Romero-Ania A. Managing Sustainable Urban Public Transport Systems: An AHP Multicriteria Decision Model. Sustainability. mayo de 2021;13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094614
Cavallaro F, Dianin A. An innovative model to estimate the accessibility of a destination by public transport. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 1 de marzo de 2020;80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102256
Song Y, Wu P, Hampson K, Anumba C. Assessing block-level sustainable transport infrastructure development using a spatial trade-off relation model. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 25 de diciembre de 2021;105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102585
Żochowska R, Kłos MJ, Soczówka P, Pilch M. Assessment of Accessibility of Public Transport by Using Temporal and Spatial Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de diciembre de 2022;14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316127
Liu R, Chen Y, Wu J, Xu T, Gao L, Zhao X. Mapping spatial accessibility of public transportation network in an urban area - A case study of Shanghai Hongqiao Transportation Hub. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 1 de marzo de 2018; 59:478-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.003
Curtis C, Ellder E, Scheurer J. Public transport accessibility tools matter: A case study of Gothenburg, Sweden. Case Stud Transp Policy. 1 de marzo de 2019;7(1):96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.12.003
Wey WM, Huang JY. Urban sustainable transportation planning strategies for livable City’s quality of life. Habitat Int. 1 de diciembre de 2018;82:9-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.002
de Paula L, Silva Marins FA. Algorithms applied in decision-making for sustainable transport. J Clean Prod. marzo de 2018; 176:1133-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.216
Carteni A, D’Acierno L, Gallo M. A Rational Decision-Making Process with Public Engagement for Designing Public Transport Services: A Real Case Application in Italy. Sustainability. agosto de 2020;12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166303
Sagaris L. Citizen participation for sustainable transport: Lessons for change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile. Research in Transportation Economics. 1 de septiembre de 2018; 69:402-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.001
Wann-Ming W. Constructing urban dynamic transportation planning strategies for improving quality of life and urban sustainability under emerging growth management principles. Sustain Cities Soc. 1 de enero de 2019; 44:275-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.015
Zhang C, Hu Y, Lu W. EVALUATING-THE-COMPREHENSIVE-BENEFIT-OF-PUBLIC-TRANSPORT-SERVICE--THE-PERSPECTIVE-OF-THREE-STAKEHOLDERSPromet--Traffic--Traffico. Traffic&Transportation. 2021; 34:179-93. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i2.3855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v34i2.3855
Zhang L, Yuan J, Gao X, Jiang D. Public transportation development decision-making under public participation: A large-scale group decision-making method based on fuzzy preference relations. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1 de noviembre de 2021;172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121020
Ogryzek M, Krupowicz W, Sajnog N. Public Participation as a Tool for Solving Socio-Spatial Conflicts of Smart Cities and Smart Villages in the Sustainable Transport System. Remote Sens (Basel). diciembre de 2021;13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13234821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13234821
Ghorbanzadeh O, Moslem S, Blaschke T, Duleba S. Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Considering Different Stakeholder Groups by an Interval-AHP Decision Support Model. Sustainability. enero de 2019;11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010009
Duleba S. AN AHP-ISM APPROACH FOR CONSIDERING PUBLIC PREFERENCES IN A PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT DECISION. TRANSPORT. 2019;34(6):662-71. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.9080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.9080
Abdulwahab AM, Ismael NT, Altameemi WTM, Musa HS. Proposed Sustainable Indicators to Assess Transport Sustainability in Baghdad City. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 1 de abril de 2023;18(4):1103-11. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180413
Ghafouri-Azar M, Diamond S, Bowes J, Gholamalizadeh E. The sustainable transport planning index: A tool for the sustainable implementation of public transportation. Sustainable Development. 1 de agosto de 2023;31(4):2656-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2537
Xinlei M, Wen C, Zhan G, Tao Y. Adaptive decision support model for sustainable transport system using fuzzy AHP and dynamical Dijkstra simulations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2022;19(10):9895-914. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022461
Tsami M, Adamos G, Nathanail E, Budilovich (Budilovica) E, Yatskiv (Jackiva) I, Magginas V. A DECISION TREE APPROACH FOR ACHIEVING HIGH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AT URBAN INTERCHANGES. TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL. septiembre de 2018;19(3, SI):194-202. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0016
Moslem S, Celikbilek Y. An integrated grey AHP-MOORA model for ameliorating public transport service quality. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW. diciembre de 2020;12(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00455-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00455-1
Kutlu Gündoğdu F, Duleba S, Moslem S, Aydın S. Evaluating public transport service quality using picture fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and linear assignment model. Appl Soft Comput. 1 de marzo de 2021;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106920
Duleba S, Moslem S. Examining Pareto optimality in analytic hierarchy process on real Data: An application in public transport service development. Expert Syst Appl. febrero de 2019; 116:21-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.049
Pham TXT, Nguyen NT, Duong LBT. Hierarchy-attribute decision-making regarding public buses and private motorbikes: a case study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. PUBLIC TRANSPORT. marzo de 2021;13(1):233-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-020-00256-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-020-00256-8
Tumsekcali E, Ayyildiz E, Taskin A. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP-WASPAS based public transportation service quality evaluation by a new extension of SERVQUAL Model: P-SERVQUAL 4.0. Expert Syst Appl. diciembre de 2021;186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115757
Duleba S. Introduction and comparative analysis of the multi-level parsimonious AHP methodology in a public transport development decision problem. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY. 2022; 73:230-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824553
Lin G, Xu H, Wang S, Lin C, Huang C. Performance Optimisation of Public Transport Networks Using AHP-Dependent Multi-Aspiration-Level Goal Programming. Energies (Basel). 1 de septiembre de 2022;15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176479
Cyril A, Mulangi RH, George V. Performance Optimization of Public Transport Using Integrated AHP-GP Methodology. Urban Rail Transit. junio de 2019;5(2):133-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-0103-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-0103-2
Hamurcu M, Eren T. Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making. Sustainability. mayo de 2020;12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093589
Jasti PC, Ram VV. Sustainable benchmarking of a public transport system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: a case study of Hyderabad, India. PUBLIC TRANSPORT. octubre de 2019;11(3):457-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00219-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00219-8
Deveci M, Mishra AR, Gokasar I, Rani P, Pamucar D, Ozcan E. A Decision Support System for Assessing and Prioritizing Sustainable Urban Transportation in Metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 1 de febrero de 2023;31(2):475-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3190613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3190613
Luo XG, Zhang HB, Zhang ZL, Yu Y, Li K. A new framework of intelligent public transportation system based on the internet of things. IEEE Access. 2019; 7:55290-304. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913288
Rodriguez Gonzalez AB, Vinagre Diaz JJ, Wilby MR, Fernandez Pozo R. Data-Driven Performance Evaluation Framework for Multi-Modal Public Transport Systems. SENSORS. enero de 2022;22(1).https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010017
Fumagalli LAW, Rezende DA, Guimarães TA. Data Intelligence in Public Transportation: Sustainable and Equitable Solutions to Urban Modals in Strategic Digital City Subproject. Sustainability (Switzerland). 1 de abril de 2022;14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084683
Reyes-Rubiano L, Serrano-Hernandez A, Montoya-Torres JR, Faulin J. The Sustainability Dimensions in Intelligent Urban Transportation: A Paradigm for Smart Cities. Sustainability. octubre de 2021;13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910653
Montero L, García J. Panorama multidimensional del desarrollo urbano en América Latina y el Caribe [Internet]. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). 2017. Disponible en: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/41974/S1700257_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Montoya JW. Cambio urbano y evolución discursiva en el análisis de la ciudad latinoamericana: de la dependencia a la globalización [Internet]. Vol. 91, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. 2006. 96 p. Disponible en: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/2868
Artículos similares
- Dr. Sócrates Muñoz, Sr. Jorge Mendoza, Srta. Mitzi Quispe, Una revisión sobre el rol de la inteligencia artificial en la industria de la construcción , Ingeniería y Competitividad: Vol. 24 Núm. 02 (2022): Ingeniería y Competitividad
También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.
Aceptado 2025-02-10
Publicado 2025-02-17
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores ceden los derechos patrimoniales a la revista y a la Universidad del Valle sobre los manuscritos aceptados, pero podrán hacer los reusos que consideren pertinentes por motivos profesionales, educativos, académicos o científicos, de acuerdo con los términos de la licencia que otorga la revista a todos sus artículos.
Los artículos serán publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA (de atribución, no comercial, sin obras derivadas).