A study on the perception of Generative AI in higher education students and teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Introduction: generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) represents a disruptive technological advancement that is profoundly transforming higher education worldwide. In response, several organizations, including UNESCO, have developed guidelines promoting the responsible integration of AI in educational and research contexts, emphasizing its supportive and human-centered role.
Objectives: this study aimed to analyze the perception of generative AI in higher education by examining the frequency of use, perceptions of its future impact, and awareness of ethical and privacy risks.
Methodology: data were collected through instruments administered to faculty members and undergraduate students at the University of Córdoba, Colombia. This dual perspective allowed comparison between academic and student viewpoints, contributing to the growing discussion on the role of GAI in higher education and research.
Results: findings reveal that the adoption of GAI is increasingly widespread among both faculty and students, though notable differences persist in their usage patterns and approaches to risk management. Students show high familiarity and frequent use, while faculty members adopt GAI more cautiously, reflecting deliberate integration into pedagogical practices.
Conclusions: despite its growing prevalence, significant gaps remain in understanding the ethical and privacy implications of GAI. These findings underscore the need for targeted training and institutional guidance to promote responsible and effective use of generative AI in higher education.
- Generative AI
- Higher Education
- Ethics and Privacy
Nguyen A, Ngo HN, Hong Y, Dang B, Thi Nguyen B. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28:4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (OEI). El futuro de la Inteligencia Artificial en educación en América Latina. Madrid: OEI; 2025. Available from: https://oei.int/oficinas/secretaria-general/publicaciones/el-futuro-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-en-educacion-en-america-latina/
Damioli G, Van Roy V, Vertesy D. The impact of artificial intelligence on labor productivity. Eurasian Bus Rev. 2021;11:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00172-8
Kim SW, Kong JH, Lee SW, Lee S. Recent advances of artificial intelligence in manufacturing industrial sectors: A review. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2022;23(1):111–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00600-3
Zeba G, Dabić M, Čičak M, Daim T, Yalcin H. Technology mining: Artificial intelligence in manufacturing. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;171:120971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120971
Cordero J, Cordero-Castillo A. Exploring the potential of generative AI in education: opportunities, challenges, and best practices for classroom integration. In: World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering & Applied Computing. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 252–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85930-4_23
Williams RT. The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Front Educ. 2024;8:1331607. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607
Francis NJ, Jones S, Smith DP. Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. Br J Biomed Sci. 2025;81:14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
UNESCO, Teacher Task Force. AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO; 2021. Available from: https://teachertaskforce.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/2021_UNESCO_AI-and-education-Guidande-for-policy-makers_EN.pdf
Shen T, Badulescu A. Generative AI and sustainable performance in manufacturing firms: roles of innovations and AI regulation. Sustainability. 2025;17(19):8661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198661
Tseng W, Warschauer M. AI-writing tools in education: If you can’t beat them, join them. J China Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2023;3(2):258–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0008
Nguyen A, Ngo HN, Hong Y, Dang B, Nguyen BPT. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(4):4221–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Bateman T. Teacher perspectives of ChatGPT as a pedagogical tool in the K-12 setting: a case study. Qual Assur Educ. 2025;33(2):203–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2024-0042
Cantú-Ortiz FJ, Galeano Sánchez N, Garrido L, Terashima-Marin H, Brena RF. An artificial intelligence educational strategy for the digital transformation. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2020;14(4):1195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00702-8
Aad SS, Hardey M. GAI for personalized learning: tailoring education to individual needs. In: After Generative AI: Preparing Faculty to Transform Education, Learning, and Pedagogy. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2025. p. 143–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-946-720251008
Rodríguez Salcedo EDR, Molina Hurtado DJ, Morocho Sáez YT, Lema Vaca KA, Morales Alvarado MA, Espinosa Rodríguez MC, Zamora Paredes BH. Ética de la IA generativa en la formación legal universitaria. Prohominum Rev Cienc Soc Hum. 2025;7(3):360–82. https://doi.org/10.47606/acven/ph0375
Wan F, Xie F, Liu B . Governance efficiency and upgrade pathways of international generative AI policies and regulations. In: BenchCouncil International Symposium on Intelligent Computers, Algorithms, and Applications. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. p. 309–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103082
Küchemann S, Rau M, Neumann K, Kuhn J. ChatGPT and other generative AI tools. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1535128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1535128
Francis NJ, Jones S, Smith DP. Generative AI in higher education: Balancing innovation and integrity. Br J Biomed Sci. 2025;81:14048. https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
McDonald N, Johri A, Ali A, Collier AH. Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Comput Hum Behav Artif Humans. 2025;3:100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121
Zakariya YF. Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1074430.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
Roumate F. Ethics of artificial intelligence, higher education, and scientific research. In: Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education and Scientific Research: Future Development. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. p. 129–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8641-3_10
Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, Spencer J, Ranschaert E, Jaremko JL, Kohli M. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Radiology. 2019;293(2):436–40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019191586
Gonzalez-Morales M, Cortes-Paez E, Paya-Zaforteza I. The revolution of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: institutional stances between regulation and censorship. In: EDULEARN25 Proceedings. IATED; 2025. p. 3364–74. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2025.0892
Jin Y, Yan L, Echeverria V, Gašević D, Martinez-Maldonado R. Generative AI in higher education: a global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2025;8:100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike).