Dynamic simulation of the benefits applying a coordination mechanism in a small agricultural producers decentralized supply chain
Main Article Content
The backup agreements are established between the supplier and the buyer to regulate the purchase of a good or service. The contract constitutes a backup inventory for the final purchase order and strengthens the commercial relationship between buyer and seller. The contract acts as a coordination mechanism in which parameters such as price, quantity, quality, and time are considered to improve the integration and coordination of the flows of resources, income, and information in the supply chain. On the other hand, in a decentralized supply chain, small producers represent the echelon with the lowest profit generated their economic activity, so this article studies small producer´s income performance once implemented the backup contract, in a decentralized three-echelon small agricultural producers supply chain located in the Center of Valle Del Cauca. Systems dynamics is the strategy used for its analysis. Variables that affect small producers' income performance in the decentralized chain are identified and a causal diagram is elaborated. Also, two scenarios are studied using Forrester diagrams: Supply Chain without a backup contract and a second scenario with the Implementation of the backup contract. Finally, it is simulated in Vensim software, results are interpreted, and future supply chain performance is analyzed.
(1) Chopra S, Meindl P, Fernández Molina AS, Carril Villarreal P. Administración de la cadena de suministro: estrategia, planeación y operación. 3rd ed. México: Prentice Hall; 2008.
(2) Ataseven C, Nair A. Assessment of supply chain integration and performance relationships: A meta-analytic investigation of the literature. International journal of production economics. 2017; 185:252-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.007
(3) Cárdenas-Barbosa I. Coordinación de agentes en cadenas de suministro descentralizadas, caso de estudio sector panificador, Palmira, Valle. [Internet]. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2013. Available from: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/52035.
(4) Giannoccaro I, Pontrandolfo P. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International journal of production economics. 2004;89(2):131-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00047-1
(5) Byerlee D, De Janvry A, Sadoulet E, Townsend R, Klytchnikova I. Informe sobre el desarrollo mundial 2008: Agricultura para el desarrollo. 2008; 0163-5085. Available from: https://documentos.bancomundial.org/es/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/747041468315832028/informe-sobre-el-desarrollo-mundial-2008-agricultura-para-el-desarrollo.
(6) Perfetti J, Balcázar A, Hernández A, Leibovich J. Políticas para el desarrollo de la agricultura en Colombia. 1st ed. Bogotá, D.C.: SAC y Fedesarrollo; 2013.
(7) Jaller S. Vinculación De Los Pequeños Productores a Los Sistemas De Abastecimiento y Distribución De Alimentos (SADA) [Internet]. Bogotá: FAO; 2010 [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available: http://www.fao.org/3/a-as326s.pdf.
(8) Simatupang TM, Sridharan R. The Collaborative Supply Chain. The international journal of logistics management. 2002;13(1):15-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090210806333
(9) Lee HL. Creating value through supply chain integration. Supply chain management review. 2000 Sep;4(4):30-6.
(10) Breiter A, Hegmanns T, Hellingrath B, Spinler S. Coordination in Supply Chain Management - Review and Identification of Directions for Future Research. In: Pahl J, Schwarze S, editors. Logistik Management Physica-Verlag HD. 2009. p. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2362-2_1.
(11) Arshinder, Kanda A, Deshmukh SG. Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International journal of production economics. 2008;115(2):316-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.011
(12) Aguas JPZ, Adarme W, Vanegas E. Coordinación En Redes De Suministro De Medicamentos. Caso Aplicado Al Sector Salud Colombiano. Revista EIA. 2016;13(25):171-183.
(13) Ramdas K, Spekman RE. Chain or Shackles: Understanding What Drives Supply-Chain Performance. Interfaces (Providence). 2000;30(4):3-21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.30.4.3.11644
(14) Zou X, Pokharel S, Piplani R. A two-period supply contract model for a decentralized assembly system. European journal of operational research. 2008;187(1):257-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.011
(15) Tsay AA. The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives. Management science. 1999;45(10):1339-58. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.10.1339
(16) Govindan K, Popiuc MN, Diabat A. Overview of coordination contracts within forward and reverse supply chains. Journal of cleaner production. 2013;47:319-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.001
(17) Peña D, Agudelo S, Rivera L. Análisis del comportamiento del contrato de distribución de ingresos en una cadena de abastecimiento frutícola. Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería. 2019;35(2):31. https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2019.06.001.
(18) Piplani R, Fu Y. A coordination framework for supply chain inventory alignment. Journal of manufacturing technology management. 2005;16(6):598-614. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380510609465
(19) Chen J, Zhang H, Sun Y. Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain. Omega (Oxford). 2012;40(5):571-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.11.005
(20) Cachon G, Lariviere M. Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Management Science. 2005; 51(1):30-44. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215
(21) Eppen GD, Iyer AV. Backup Agreements in Fashion Buying--The Value of Upstream Flexibility. Management science. 1997;43(11):1469-84. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.11.1469
(22) Goic M. Dualidad y Análisis de Sensibilidad. Santiago: Universidad de Chile. Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial. 2012;1-12.
(23) Hou J, Zhao L. Backup agreements with penalty scheme under supply disruptions. Int J Syst Sci. 2012;43(5):987–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2011.617891
(24) Mathur PP, Shah J. Supply chain contracts with capacity investment decision: Two-way penalties for coordination. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;114(1):56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.012
(25) Gan X, Sethi SP, Zhou J. Commitment-penalty contracts in drop-shipping supply chains with asymmetric demand information. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;204(3):449–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.11.008
(26) Yin Z, Wang C. Strategic cooperation with a backup supplier for the mitigation of supply disruptions. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(12):4300-4312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1410246
(27) Tsai W-C, Wang C-H. Optimal production lot size under backup agreement allowing substitute products. RAIRO Oper Res. 2020;54(5):1309–26. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019047
(28) Yuan S, Das S, Ramesh R, Qiao C. Service agreement trifecta: Backup resources, price and penalty in the availability-aware cloud. Inf Syst Res. 2018;29(4):947–64. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0755
(29) ULPGC. Parte primera: distribuciones de probabilidad [Internet]. Ulpgc.es. [cited 2021 Jun 13]. Available from: https://www2.ulpgc.es/hege/almacen/download/5/5509/Tema_1.pdf
Accepted 2021-05-19
Published 2022-01-15
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike).