Reflection on the vision of Integrated Management of vulnerability due to water shortages in rural zone of Colombia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The present review article refers to the management and baking processes to deal with environmental problems, specifically those that have to do with risk by water supply in rural areas, making an analysis of the integral management of water, the different international and national approaches, to reach the approach in Colombia and how the country welcomes these global guidelines for the proper management of water; It also proposes the analysis of three concepts that make it possible to complement IWRM, as a central approach that promotes multiple convergences from the academic sphere, such as adaptive management, resilience and governance to strengthen the systemic approach required in the management of water under the premise of sustainability. As a consequence of this analysis, the microbasin is considered as a socioecosystem given the intrinsic characteristics to provide water for different uses, being adversely affected by climatic anomalies, which deserves an analysis of the vulnerability of supply microbasins to climate change and climate variability to make a critical approach to the problems in the region in terms of management.
(1) Casanoves F, Pla L, Di Rienzo JA. Valoración y análisis de la diversidad funcional y su relación con los servicios ecosistémicos. In: Serie Técnica - Informe Técnico Número 384 [Internet]. Turrialba: Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza CATIE; 2011. p. 119. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11554/8190.
(2) Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Política Nacional de Gestión Integral de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE) [Internet]. Instituto Humboldt, editor. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible; 2012. 128 p. Available from: http://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/BosquesBiodiversidadyServiciosEcosistemicos/pdf/Politica-Nacional-de-Biodiversidad/PNGIBSE_espanol_web.pdf.
(3) Vilardy SP, González JA, Martín-López B, Oteros-Rozas E. Los servicios de los ecosistemas de la Reserva de Biosfera Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. Revibec Rev Iberoam Econ ecológica [Internet]. 2012;19:66–83. Available from: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/103316 .
(4) Muñoz MIC. Análisis de transformaciones del paisaje en el norte del Parque Nacional Natural Puracé [Internet]. Universidad del Cauca: 2015. Available from: https://ipt.biodiversidad.co/cr-sib/resource.do?r=0032015_pnnpurace_20160823.
(5) Camargo ESC, Carreño JAF, Barón EMP. Los servicios ecosistémicos de regulación: tendencias e impacto en el bienestar humano. Rev Investig Agrar y Ambient [Internet]. 2012;3(1):77–83. Available from: http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/index.php/riaa/article/view/936.
(6) World Commission On Environment and Development. Our Common Future [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1987. 400 p. Available from: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/our-common-future-9780192820808?cc=us&lang=en.
(7) The Dublin Statement on Water and Sustainable Development. In: ICWE - International Conference on Water and the Environment [Internet]. Dublin; 1992. p. 70. Available from: https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/71-ICWE92-9739.pdf.
(8) Global Water Partnership. Integrated Water Resources Management [Internet]. Stockholm; 2000. (TAC Background Papers Series). Report No.: 4. Available from: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/publications/background-papers/04-integrated-water-resources-management-2000-english.pdf.
(9) Gallopín GC. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2006;16(3):293–303. Doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000409.
(10) Idrobo J. Desarrollo de un modelo conceptual para la gestión ambiental integral en ecosistemas de páramo [Internet]. Universidad del Cauca; 2017. Available from: https://www.unicauca.edu.co/gea/?q=node/349.
(11) Rodríguez CZ. Gobernabilidad sobre el recurso hídrico en Colombia: entre avances y retos. Rev gestión y Ambient [Internet]. 2012;15(3):99–112. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/gestion/article/view/36284.
(12) Política nacional para la gestión integral del recurso hídrico [Internet]. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de ambiente vivienda y desarrollo territorial de Colombia; 2010. 124 p. Available from: http://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/GestionIntegraldelRecursoHidrico/pdf/plan-hidrico-nacional/Politica-nacional-Gestion-integral-de-recurso-Hidrico.pdf.
(13) Casas AF. Programa RICCLISA - Presentación [Internet]. 2014 [Consulted 2014/06/9]. p. 44. Available from: https://issuu.com/henryromero3/docs/programa_ricclisa_presentacion_ciat.
(14) Daza SJ. Capacidad de adaptación social y ecosistémica para la alta montaña andina [Internet]. Universidad del Cauca; 2017. Available from: https://www.unicauca.edu.co/gea/?q=node/348.
(15) Colding J, Folke C, Berkes F, editors. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/navigating-socialecological-systems/95AC131C7A4F5D9259AD4EABDDDE993F.
(16) Vilardy-Quiroga S. Estructura y dinámica de la ecorregión Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: una aproximación desde el marco conceptual de los sistemas socio-ecológicos complejos y la teoría de la resilencia [Internet]. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2009. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/4035.
(17) IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambio climático 2007: Informe de síntesis. Contribución de los Grupos de trabajo I, II y III al Cuarto Informe de evaluación del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático [Internet]. Pachauri R, Reisinger A, editors. Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (IPCC); 2007. 104 p. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_sp.pdf.
(18) Holling C. Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems. Ecosystems [Internet]. 2001;4(5):390–405. Doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
(19) Fazey I, Fazey JA, Fischer J, Sherren K, Warren J, Noss RF, et al. Adaptive capacity and learning to learn as leverage for social–ecological resilience. Front Ecol Environ [Internet]. 2007;5(7):375–80. Doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[375:ACALTL]2.0.CO;2. Available from: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/1540-9295%282007%295%5B375%3AACALTL%5D2.0.CO%3B2.
(20) Folke C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2006;16(3):253–67. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000379?via%3Dihub.
(21) Ostrom E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 2009;325(5939):419–22. Doi: 10.1126/science.1172133. Available from: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/325/5939/419
(22) Holling C. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1978. 353 p. Available from: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/823/.
(23) Nyberg B. An introductory guide to adaptative management for project leaders and participants. Victoria BC, Canada: BC Forest Service, Forest Practices Branch; 1999.
(24) Nyberg B. Adaptive management: strategies for coping with change and uncertainty. In: Dimensions of Sustainable Development - Vol II [Internet]. Oxford, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co. Ltd; 2009. Available from: https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/C13/E1-46B-14-00.pdf.
(25) Kammembauer H, León J, Castellón N, Gómez S, Faustino J, Prins C. Modelo de cogestión adaptativa de cuencas hidrográficas: Propuesta conceptual basada en la revisión crítica de las experiencias en Honduras y Nicaragua. Rev Recur Nat y Ambient [Internet]. 2010;(59–60):117–22. Available from: https://www.catie.ac.cr/attachments/article/542/Modelo de cogestion adaptativa.pdf.
(26) Akamani K. Adaptive Water Governance: Integrating the Human Dimensions into Water Resource Governance. J Contemp Water Res Educ [Internet]. 2016;158(1):2–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2016.03215.x.
(27) Rojas MPV, Casas AF, Ordóñez DMR, Sarmiento JDO, Idrobo J, Sarria VEC, et al. Metodología para el análisis de vulnerabilidad en cuencas abastecedoras de agua ante la variabilidad climática. Rev Ing Univ MEDELLíN [Internet]. 2014;13(25):29–43. Doi: 10.22395/rium.v13n25a2. Available from: https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/994.
(28) Daza SJ, Casas AF. Factores que determinan la resiliencia socio-ecológica para la alta montaña andina. Rev Ing Univ MEDELLíN [Internet]. 2014;13(25):45–55. Doi: 10.22395/rium.v13n25a3. Available from: https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/995.
(29) Alonso S, Benito G, Dachs J, Duarte CM, Montes C, Pardo M, et al. Cambio Global: Impacto de la actividad humana sobre el sistema Tierra [Internet]. Cyan, Proyectos y Producciones Editoriales S., editor. Colección Divulgación. Madrid: CSIC - CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS; 2006. 170 p. Available from: https://www.csic.es/es/ciencia-y-sociedad/libros-de-divulgacion/coleccion-divulgacion/cambio-global-impacto-de-la-0.
(30) Walker B, Salt D. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world [Internet]. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2006. 192 p. Available from: https://islandpress.org/books/resilience-thinking.
(31) Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling C, Walker B. Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. AMBIO A J Hum Environ [Internet]. 2002;31(5):437–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437.
(32) Gunderson L, Cosens BA, Chaffin BC, Arnold CAT, Fremier AK, Garmestani AS, et al. Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social-ecological water systems. Ecol Soc [Internet]. 2017;22(1). Doi: 10.5751/ES-08879-220131. Available from: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/article.php/8879.
(33) Holling C. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. IIASA Research Report (Reprint). Repr from Annu Rev Ecol Syst [Internet]. 1973;4:1–23. Available from: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/26.
(34) Holling C, Meffe GK. Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conserv Biol [Internet]. 1996;10(2):328–37. Doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x. Available from: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x.
(35) Mittelbach GG, Turner AM, Hall DJ, Rettig JE, Osenberg CW. Perturbation and Resilience: A Long‐Term, Whole‐Lake Study of Predator Extinction and Reintroduction. Ecol Ecol Soc Am [Internet]. 1995;76(8):2347–60. Doi: 10.2307/2265812. Available from: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2265812.
(36) Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems [Internet]. 2014;4(8):765–781. Doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9.
(37) Mayntz R. Governance en el Estado moderno. POSTData Rev Reflexión y Análisis Político [Internet]. 2006;(11):103–17. Available from: http://www.revistapostdata.com.ar/2012/01/governance-en-el-estado-moderno-renate-mayntz/.
(38) Eising R, Kohler-Koch B, editors. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union [Internet]. 1st Edition. London: Taylor & Francis group; 1999. 340 p. Available from: https://www.crcpress.com/The-Transformation-of-Governance-in-the-European-Union/Eising-Kohler-Koch/p/book/9780415430371.
(39) Mayntz R. Socialist academies of sciences: the enforced orientation of basic research at user needs. Res Policy [Internet]. 1998;27(8):781–91. Doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00090-0. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733398000900.
(40) Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres (UNGRD). Terminología sobre Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres y Fenómenos Amenazantes [Internet]. Cristian C. Bogotá, DC; 2017. 48 p. Available from: https://repositorio.gestiondelriesgo.gov.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11762/20761/Terminologia-GRD-2017.pdf;jsessionid=C9C25121C856709B8D902F4AA83D27ED?sequence=2.
(41) Jong W de, Ruiz S, Becker M. Conflicts and communal forest management in northern Bolivia. For Policy Econ [Internet]. 2006;8(4):447–57. Doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.011. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934105001036.
(42) Ruiz SA, Gentes IG. Retos y perspectivas de la gobernanza del agua y gestión integral de recursos hídricos en Bolivia. Eur Rev Lat Am Caribb Stud [Internet]. 2008;(85):41–59. Doi: 10.18352/erlacs.9618. Available from: https://www.erlacs.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/erlacs.9618/.
(43) Rogers P, Hall AW. Gobernabilidad Efectiva del Agua [Internet]. 2003. (TEC BACKGROUND PAPERS). Report No.: 7. Available from: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/publications/background-papers/07-effective-water-governance-2003-spanish.pdf.
(44) Andrew C, Goldsmith M. From Local Government to Local Governance—and Beyond? Int Polit Sci Rev [Internet]. 1998;19(2):101–117. Doi: 10.1177/019251298019002002. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/019251298019002002.
(45) Solanes M, Jouravlev A. Water governance for development and sustainability [Internet]. ECLAC, editor. CEPAL; 2006. 84 p. Available from: https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/6308-water-governance-development-and-sustainability.
(46) Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Amo DG Del, et al. Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012;7(6):e38970. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
(47) Melville R. La cuenca fluvial como territorio fragmentado para la organizacion del aprovechamiento, conservacion y administracion de los recursos hidricos. In: Scott C, Philipus W, Maranon-Pimental B, editors. Asignacion, productividad y manejo de recursos hidricos en cuencas: memorias del Seminario Internacional Asignacion, Manejo y Productividad de los Recursos Hidricos en Cuencas [Internet]. Mexico, DF: International Water Management Institute (IWMI); 2000. p. 57–73. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/37063.
(48) Santacruz de León G. Hacia una gestión integral de los recursos hídricos en la Cuenca del Río Valles, Huasteca, México / Germán Santacruz de León [Internet]. 1st Edition. San Luis Potosí: El Colegio de San Luis, A.C.; 2007. 383 p. Available from: http://www.colsan.edu.mx/investigacion/aguaysociedad/proyectoaguaSLP/Documentos/TESISSANTACRUZ.pdf.
(49) Dourojeanni A, Jouravlev A. Evolución de políticas hídricas de América Latina y el Caribe [Internet]. 2002. (Serie Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura). Report No.: 51. Available from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/6410.
(50) Scown MW, Flotemersch JE, Spanbauer TL, Eason T, Garmestani A, Chaffin BC. People and water: Exploring the social-ecological condition of watersheds of the United States. Elem Sci Anthr [Internet]. 2017;5:64–56. Doi: 10.1525/elementa.189. Available from: https://www.elementascience.org/articles/10.1525/elementa.189/#.
(51) Vargas S, Mollard E. Problemas socioambientales y experiencias organizativas en cuencas de Mexico [Internet]. 1st Edition. Mollard E, editor. Mexico, DF: Instituto Mexicano de Tecnologia dei Agua; 2005. 387 p. Available from: https://agua.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/Problemas-Socio-Ambientales-y-Experiencias-Organizativas-en-las-Cuencas-de-Mexico.pdf.
(52) Adger WN. Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2006;16(3):268–81. Doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000422.
(53) IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects: Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge; 2014. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415379.
(54) Berrouet LM, Machado J, Villegas-Palacio C. Vulnerability of socio—ecological systems: A conceptual Framework. Ecol Indic [Internet]. 2018;84:632–47. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.051. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X17304648.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike).