Innovación Abierta en las PYMEs: una Revisión de la Literatura
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Introducción: Las pequeñas y medianas empresas (pymes) son esenciales para el desarrollo económico en los países en desarrollo, ya que juegan un papel clave en la generación de empleo y en la dinamización de las economías locales. La innovación es crucial para mejorar su competitividad; sin embargo, debido a los recursos limitados con los que cuentan, la innovación abierta se presenta como una alternativa viable para potenciar su capacidad innovadora. A pesar de la importancia de este enfoque, la investigación sobre innovación en el contexto de las pymes sigue siendo limitada.
Metodología: Este artículo realiza una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura existente sobre innovación abierta en pymes, con el objetivo de explorar cómo se desarrolla este proceso en dichas organizaciones. Se analizaron 127 artículos académicos obtenidos de bases de datos como Scopus, Web of Science y Science Direct. El análisis se centró en identificar las principales estrategias, desafíos, facilitadores e indicadores asociados con la innovación abierta, así como el papel que desempeñan las tecnologías en este proceso.
Resultados: Los resultados muestran una adopción creciente de estrategias de innovación abierta en las pymes. Se destaca la importancia de los indicadores de innovación y el uso de tecnologías que faciliten la transferencia de conocimiento, lo cual es clave dada la limitación de recursos. Los métodos más utilizados para estudiar este fenómeno son los casos de estudio y las encuestas. Además, se observa un enfoque creciente en herramientas para interactuar con los clientes y colaborar con grandes empresas. La tecnología juega un papel esencial en la integración del conocimiento y en la mejora de la agilidad en el mercado.
Conclusiones: A pesar de las ventajas de la innovación abierta, las pymes enfrentan desafíos significativos, como la falta de financiación, la resistencia al cambio y las dificultades en la protección de la propiedad intelectual. Sin embargo, la colaboración con universidades y consultores fortalece los ecosistemas de innovación, y las tecnologías digitales juegan un rol crucial en optimizar la absorción de conocimiento. Los riesgos asociados a la protección de la propiedad intelectual y la optimización de los procesos de transferencia de conocimiento son áreas críticas a abordar para mejorar los resultados de la innovación abierta en las pymes.
- Innovación abierta
- pymes
- revisión de la literatura
(1) Adam F, Hertwig M, Barwasser A, Lentes J, Zimmermann N & Siee M. Crowd engineering: Approach for smart and agile product development in networks. Procedia Manufacturing, (2019) 39, 1317-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.326
(2) Akhmadi S &Tsakalerou M. Innovation propensity and firm size: Evidence from manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, (2021) 55, 543-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.074
(3) Akinwale Y. Empirical analysis of inbound open innovation and small and medium-sized enterprises performance: Evidence from oil and gas industry. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, (2018) 21, 1-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1608
(4) Albats E, Bogers M & Podmetina D. Companies human capital for university partnerships: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2020) 157, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120085
(5) Alhusen H, Bennat T, Bizer K, Cantner U, Horstmann E, Kalthaus M, Proeger T, Sternberg R & Töpfer S. A new measurement conception for the ‘Doing-Using-Interacting’ mode of innovation. Research Policy, (2021) 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104214
(6) Aschehoug SH, Lodgaard E & Schulte K. Success factors for open innovation in Norwegian manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, (2019) 84, 1107-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.279
(7) Ates A. Exploring adaptive small and medium enterprises through the lens of open strategy. Strategic Responsiveness and Adaptive Organizations: New Research Frontiers in International Strategic Management, (2019) 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-011-120191003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-011-120191003
(8) Belitski M & Rejeb N. Does open customer innovation model hold for family firms?. Journal of Business Research, (2022) 145, 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.012
(9) Benhayoun L, Le Dain MA, Dominguez-Péry C & Lyons AC. SMEs embedded in collaborative innovation networks: How to measure their absorptive capacity? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2020) 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120196
(10) Bradonjic P, Franke N & Lüthje C. Decision-makers underestimation of user innovation. Research Policy, (2019) 48(6), 1354-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020
(11) Brock K, Ouden ED, Van der Klauw K, Podoynitsyna K & Langerak F. Light the way for smart cities: Lessons from Philips Lighting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2019) 142, 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.021
(12) Carrasco-Carvajal O, Castillo Vergara M & García-Pérez-de-Lema D. Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research. Review of Managerial Science, (2023) 7(2), 397-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00533-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00533-9
(13) Chandran S, Poklemba R, Sopko J & Šafár L. Organizational innovation and cost reduction analysis of manufacturing process: Case study. Management Systems in Production Engineering, (2019) 27(3),183-188. https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2019-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2019-0029
(14) Cheng C & Shiu E. How to enhance SMEs customer involvement using social media: The role of Social CRM. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, (2019) 37(1):22-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618774831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618774831
(15) Chesbrough H & Bogers M. Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. (2014) 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.001.0001
(16) Chesbrough H & Brunswicker S. A fad or a phenomenon? The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Research Technology Management, (2014) 57(2), 16-25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5437/08956308X5702196
(17) Chesbrough H. The governance and performance of Xerox’s technology spin-off companies. Research Policy, (2003)32, 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00017-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00017-3
(18) Chesbrough H. The future of open innovation. Research Technology Management, (2017) 60(1), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054
(19) Daxhammer K, Luckert M, Doerr M & Bauernhansl T. Development of a strategic business model framework for multi-sided platforms to ensure sustainable innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, (2019) 39, 1354-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.322
(20) De Silva M, Howells J & Meyer M. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge-based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, (2018) 47(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011
(21) Dehghani M, Kennedy RW, Mashatan A, Rese A & Karavidas D. High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organizational adoption of blockchain technology. Journal of Business Research, (2022)149, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.015
(22) Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N & Lim W. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, (2021)133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
(23) Doppio N, Väinämӧ S & Haukipuro L. Design elements of innovation contests supporting open innovation in SMEs: An action research study. Journal of Innovation Management, (2020) 8(4), 26-56. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.004_0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.004_0003
(24) Enkel E, Gassmann O & Chesbrough H. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, (2019) 39(4), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x
(25) Erol S & Klug S. Together we are less alone: A concept for a regional open innovation learning lab. Procedia Manufacturing, (2020) 45, 540-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.075
(26) Gaglio C, Kraemer-Mbula E & Lorenz E.. The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2022) 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785
(27) Giusti JD, Alberti FG & Belfanti F. Makers and clusters: Knowledge leaks in open innovation networks. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, (2020)5(1), 20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.04.001
(28) Hannen J, Antons D, Piller F, Salge TO, Coltman T & Devinney TM. Containing the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome in external knowledge absorption and open innovation: The role of indirect countermeasures. Research Policy, (2019) 48(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103822
(29) Hashimy L, Treiblmaier H & Jain G. Distributed ledger technology as a catalyst for open innovation adoption among small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of High Technology Management Research, (2021) 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100405
(30) Heenkenda H, Xu F, Kulathunga K & Senevirathne W. The role of innovation capability in enhancing sustainability in SMEs: An emerging economy perspective. Sustainability, (2022) 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710832
(31) Hervás-Oliver JL, Parrilli MD, Rodríguez-Pose A & Sempere-Ripoll F. The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, (2021) 50(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316
(32) Hervas-Oliver JL, Sempere-Ripoll F, Boronat-Moll C & Estelles-Miguel S. SME open innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicated external knowledge sourcing. Journal of Small Business Management, (2020) 58(2), 409-445 https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072
(33) Hilkenmeier F, Fechtelpeter J & Decius J. How to foster innovation in SMEs: evidence of the effectiveness of a project-based technology transfer approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, (2021) 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09913-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09913-x
(34) Hossain M, Islam KZ, Sayeed MA & Kauranen I. A comprehensive review of open innovation literature. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, (2016) 7(1), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2015-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2015-0009
(35) Ioanid A, Deselnicu DC & Militaru G. The impact of social networks on SMEs innovation potential. Procedia Manufacturing, (2018) 22, 936-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.133
(36) Issa A, Schumacher S, Hatiboglu B, Gros E & Bauernhansl T. Open innovation in the workplace: Future Work Lab as a Living Lab. Procedia CIRP, (2018) 72, 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.149
(37) Janssen MJ & Abbasiharofteh M. Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2022) 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121689
(38) Jemala M. Systemic technology innovation management and analysis of other forms of IP protection. International Journal of Innovation Studies, (2022) 6(4), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.08.001
(39) Jiraphanumes K, Aujirapongpan S & Songkajorn Y. Influence of diagnostic and dynamic capabilities on frugal innovation development: An empirical study of the Thai auto parts industry. Asia Pacific Management Review. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.10.001
(40) Kim C, Park SH & Seol BM. The role of universities for the change of a network structure in the regional business ecosystem. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (2018) 12(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-044
(41) Kim H & Kim E. How an open innovation strategy for commercialization affects the firm performance of Korean healthcare IT SMEs. Sustainability, (2018) 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072476
(42) Kim M, Kim JE, Sawng YW & Lim KS. Impacts of innovation type SMEs R&D capability on patent and new product development. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (2018) 12(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-043
(43) Kleine M, Heite J & Huber LR. Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation outcomes. Reserch Policy, (2022) 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104515
(44) Lalic B, Todorovic T, Medic N, Bogojevic B, Ciric D & Marjanovic U. The impact of inter-organizational cooperation on R&D expenditure of manufacturing companies. Procedia Manufacturing, (2019) 39, 1401-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.315
(45) Larsen MS & Lassen AH. Design parameters for smart manufacturing innovation processes. Procedia CIRP, (2020) 93, 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.068
(46) Limaj E & Bernroider E. The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, (2019) 94, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.052
(47) Lingens B, Huber F & Gassmann O. Loner or team player: How firms allocate orchestrator tasks amongst ecosystem actors. European Management Journal, (2022) 40(4), 559-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.001
(48) Marcinkowski B & Gawin B. Data-driven business model development - insights from the facility management industry. Journal of Facilities Management, (2020)19(2), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-08-2020-0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-08-2020-0051
(49) Mastrocinque E, Lamberti E, Ramirez FJ & Petrovic D. Measuring open innovation under uncertainty: A fuzzy logic approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, (2022) 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101673
(50) Micheli P, Wilner S, Bhatti SH, Mura M & Beverland MB. Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, (2019) 36(2), 124-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466
(51) Michna A & Kmieciak R. Open-mindedness culture, knowledge-sharing, financial performance, and industry 4.0 in SMEs. Sustainability, (2020) 12(21), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219041
(52) Moon B. Unleash liquidity constraints or competitiveness potential: The impact of R&D grant on external financing on innovation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, (2022) 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100195
(53) Mourtzis D, Boli N, Dimitrakopoulos G, Zygomalas S & Koutoupes A. Enabling Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to improve their potential through the Teaching Factory paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, (2018) 23, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.014
(54) Petraite M, Mubarak MF, Rimantas R & Von Zedtwitz M. The role of international networks in upgrading national innovation systems. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, (2022) 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121873
(55) Pollok P, Lüttgens D & Piller FT. Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status. Research Policy, (2019) 48(1), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.022
(56) Rigg C, Coughlan P, O’Leary D & Coghlan D. A practice perspective on knowledge, learning and innovation-insights from an EU network of small food producers. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, (2021) 33(7), 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1877832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1877832
(57) Sabando-Vera D, Yonfa-Medranda M, Montalván Burbano N, Albors-Garrigos J & Parrales-Guerrero K. Worldwide research on open innovation in SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, (2022)8(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010020
(58) Šebestová J, Krejčí P & Šiška P. “Be or not to be”: A dilemma of business policy support on a regional level. Central European Business Review, (2018) 7(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.192
(59) Sikandar H & Kohar U. A systematic literature review of open innovation in small and medium enterprises in the past decade. Foresight, (2022) 24(6), 742-756. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-01-2021-0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-01-2021-0030
(60) Stanislawski R. Open innovation as a value chain for small and medium-sized enterprises: Determinants of the use of open innovation. Sustainability, (2020) 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083290
(61) Stefan I, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P &Vanhaverbeke W. Trajectories towards balancing value creation and capture: Resolution paths and tension loops in open innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, (2021)39(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.004
(62) Sӧderholm P, Hellsmark H, Frishammar J, Hansson J, Mossberg J & Sandstrӧm A. Technological development for sustainability: The role of network management in the innovation policy mix. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2019) 138, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.010
(63) Teixeira AAC & Ferreira C. Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, (2019) 4(3), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002
(64) Tsakalerou M & Akhmadi S. Agents of innovation: Clusters in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, (2021) 55, 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.045
(65) Tӧrӧk A, Tóth J & Balogh JM. Push or Pull? The nature of innovation process in the Hungarian food SMEs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, (2019)4(4), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.007
(66) Usman M, Roijakkers N, Vanhaverbeke W & Frattini F. A systematic review of the literature on open innovation in SMEs. Researching open innovation in SMEs, (2018) 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0001
(67) Van de Vrande V, De Jong JPJ, Vanhaverbeke W & De Rochemont M. Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, (2009) 29(6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
(68) Vega-Jurado J, García-Granero A & Manjarrés-Henríquez L. Do firms benefit from interactions with public research organisations beyond innovation? An analysis of small firms. European Research on Management and Business Economics, (2021)27(2). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148
(69) Von Joerg G & Carlos J. Design framework for the implementation of AI-based (service) business models for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, (2022)4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01003-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01003-z
(70) Weidner N, Som O & Horvat D. An integrated conceptual framework for analysing heterogeneous configurations of absorptive capacity in manufacturing firms with the DUI innovation mode. Technovation, (2023) 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102635
(71) Xu G, Wu Y, Minshall T & Zhou Y. Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2018) 136, 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030
(72) Xu H, Wu Y & Hamari J. What determines the successfulness of a crowdsourcing campaign: A study on the relationships between indicators of trustworthiness, popularity, and success. Journal of Business Research, (2022) 139, 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.032
Descargas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores ceden los derechos patrimoniales a la revista y a la Universidad del Valle sobre los manuscritos aceptados, pero podrán hacer los reusos que consideren pertinentes por motivos profesionales, educativos, académicos o científicos, de acuerdo con los términos de la licencia que otorga la revista a todos sus artículos.
Los artículos serán publicados bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA (de atribución, no comercial, sin obras derivadas).