Main Article Content

Authors

: In contemporary times, the food industry is tasked with ensuring that its products maintain good quality, with packaging being one of the most evident challenges. Traditionally, food packaging materials were derived from petroleum, but in recent years, biomaterials have emerged as viable alternatives to fulfill these functions. It is important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these biomaterials compared to conventional packaging. Therefore, this study conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis between traditional packaging and bio-based packaging for food in terms of market, technical aspects, and regulations. Information was gathered from specialized databases, and 59 technical datasheets of conventional packaging and 28 technical datasheets of bio-based packaging were analyzed. The results revealed that certain bio-based packaging materials, such as cellulose, polyglycolic acid, and polyhydroxybutyrate, are excellent alternatives for food packaging, particularly in situations requiring moisture and oxidation resistance, as well as the ability to withstand high temperatures during production and storage. Furthermore, it was found that the bio-based packaging market experiences significant growth due to the increasing demand for sustainable packaging, government regulations against single-use plastics, and consumer trends. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the food industry considers the use of bio-based packaging as a viable and promising solution to enhance the quality and preservation of their products while meeting environmental requirements and consumer preferences.

Julieth Katherin Acosta Medina, Universidad Industrial de Santander. Bucaramanga, Colombia

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-069X

Orlando Enrique Contreras Pacheco, Universidad Industrial de Santander. Bucaramanga

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-7063

Aura Cecilia Pedraza Avella, Universidad Industrial de Santander. Bucaramanga, Colombia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-2970

1.
Acosta Medina JK, Contreras Pacheco OE, Pedraza Avella AC. Español. inycomp [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 26 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];25(3):e- 21213066. Available from: https://revistaingenieria.univalle.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria_y_competitividad/article/view/13066

Vasile C, Baican M. Progresses in Food Packaging, Food Quality, and Safety—Controlled-Release Antioxidant and/or Antimicrobial Packaging. Molecules. 2021 Feb 26;26(5):1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051263

Nilsen‐Nygaard J, Fernández EN, Radusin T, Rotabakk BT, Sarfraz J, Sharmin N, et al. Current status of biobased and biodegradable food packaging materials: Impact on food quality and effect of innovative processing technologies. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021 Mar 6;20(2):1333–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12715

Venkatesh G. Circular Bio-economy—Paradigm for the Future: Systematic Review of Scientific Journal Publications from 2015 to 2021. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2022 Mar 7;2(1):231–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00084-3

Popovic I, Bossink BAG, van der Sijde PC. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Decision to Purchase Food in Environmentally Friendly Packaging: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here? Sustainability. 2019 Dec 16;11(24):7197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247197

Fram S. The Constant Comparative Analysis Method Outside of Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report. 2015 Jan 14; DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1569

Cotte Poveda A, Pardo Martínez CI. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): an application for the industry. Qual Quant. 2013 Apr 7;47(3):1315–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9592-0

Singha K, Regubalan B, Pandit P, Maity S, Ahmed S. Introduction to Nanotechnology‐Enhanced Food Packaging Industry. In: Nanotechnology‐Enhanced Food Packaging. Wiley; 2022. p. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527827718.ch1

Technavio. Packaging Market by End-user, Type, and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2021-2025 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.technavio.com/report/packaging-market-industry-analysis

Data Bridge Market Research. Global Plastic Packaging Market – Industry Trends and Forecast to 2028 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-plastic-packaging-market

Shaikh S, Yaqoob M, Aggarwal P. An overview of biodegradable packaging in food industry. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021;4:503–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2021.07.005

Narancic T, Cerrone F, Beagan N, O’Connor KE. Recent Advances in Bioplastics: Application and Biodegradation. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Apr 15;12(4):920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040920

Vartiainen J, Vähä-Nissi M, Harlin A. Biopolymer Films and Coatings in Packaging Applications—A Review of Recent Developments. Materials Sciences and Applications. 2014;05(10):708–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2014.510072

Abreu JL. Hipótesis, Método & Diseño de Investigación (Hipótesis, Método y Diseño de Investigación). Daena. 2012;7(2):187–97.

Rendón-Macías ME, Villasís-Keever MÁ, Miranda-Novales MG. Estadística descriptiva. Rev Alerg Mex. 2016 Oct 30;63(4):397–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v63i4.230

Zapata WA, Gómez Caicedo MI, Villa Martínez Á. Estudio sobre la investigación en marketing y su importancia en los procesos de exportación: análisis bibliométrico y temático en Scopus. Revista Perspectiva Empresarial. 2021 Dec 15;8(2):91–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16967/23898186.720

Research and Markets. Biodegradable Packaging Market, by Product Type, and Paper, by End-Use Industry, and by Region - Size, Share, Outlook, and Opportunity Analysis, 2021 – 2028 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5555907/biodegradable-packaging-market-by-product-type?gclid=Cj0KCQjwy5maBhDdARIsAMxrkw2jcfbdRM4kHj9notxS7Qs1qasGWuElrS9cjn3PrrCpTw6KKzLd8ocaAtGnEALw_wcB

Euromonitor. Packaged food: Quarterly statement Q4 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.euromonitor.com/packaged-food-quarterly-statement-q4-2021/report

European Bioplastics. Actualización de mercado de bioplásticos 2020 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://docs.european-bioplastics.org/conference/Report_Bioplastics_Market_Data_2020_short_version.pdf

Mahardika M, Amelia D, Azril, Syafri E. Applications of nanocellulose and its composites in bio packaging-based starch. Mater Today Proc. 2023;74:415–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.138

Teck Kim Y, Min B, Won Kim K. General Characteristics of Packaging Materials for Food System. In: Innovations in Food Packaging. Elsevier; 2014. p. 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394601-0.00002-3

Kumari SVG, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G. Recent advances and future prospects of cellulose, starch, chitosan, polylactic acid and polyhydroxyalkanoates for sustainable food packaging applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022 Nov;221:163–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.203

Gómez-Estaca J, Gavara R, Catalá R, Hernández-Muñoz P. The Potential of Proteins for Producing Food Packaging Materials: A Review. Packaging Technology and Science. 2016 Apr;29(4–5):203–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2198

Sonar CR, Al-Ghamdi S, Marti F, Tang J, Sablani SS. Performance evaluation of biobased/biodegradable films for in-package thermal pasteurization. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2020 Dec;66:102485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102485

Gadhave R V., Das A, Mahanwar PA, Gadekar PT. Starch Based Bio-Plastics: The Future of Sustainable Packaging. Open Journal of Polymer Chemistry. 2018;08(02):21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2018.82003

Kale G, Kijchavengkul T, Auras R, Rubino M, Selke SE, Singh SP. Compostability of Bioplastic Packaging Materials: An Overview. Macromol Biosci. 2007 Mar 8;7(3):255–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600168

Soares CT de M, Ek M, Östmark E, Gällstedt M, Karlsson S. Recycling of multi-material multilayer plastic packaging: Current trends and future scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2022 Jan;176:105905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105905

Goel V, Luthra P, Kapur GS, Ramakumar SS V. Biodegradable/Bio-plastics: Myths and Realities. J Polym Environ. 2021 Oct 6;29(10):3079–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02099-1

Cazaudehore G, Guyoneaud R, Evon P, Martin-Closas L, Pelacho AM, Raynaud C, et al. Can anaerobic digestion be a suitable end-of-life scenario for biodegradable plastics? A critical review of the current situation, hurdles, and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2022 May;56:107916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107916

Mendes AC, Pedersen GA. Perspectives on sustainable food packaging:– is bio-based plastics a solution? Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021 Jun;112:839–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.049

FDA. Food [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/food

FDA. Resumen de la Regulación del Sistema de Calidad [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/135790/download

FDA. Guía de etiquetado de alimentos Orientación para la industria [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.siicex.gob.pe/siicex/resources/calidad/FDA-%20Guia-de-Etiquetado-2009.pdf

OPS. Codex Alimentarius [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2015/cha-codex-alimentario.pdf

Friedrich D. How regulatory measures towards biobased packaging influence the strategic behaviour of the retail industry: A microempirical study. J Clean Prod. 2020 Jul;260:121128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121128

ISO. ISO 18606:2013. Packaging and the environment — Organic recycling [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/55874.html

ISO. ISO 17088:2012 - Especificación para plásticos compostables [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.plas-tic.org/contenido/iso-170882012-especificaci%C3%B3n-para-pl%C3%A1sticos-compostables

EUR Lex. Plásticos de un solo uso: reducción del impacto en el medio ambiente [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ES/legal-content/summary/single-use-plastics-fighting-the-impact-on-the-environment.html#:~:text=DOCUMENTO%20PRINCIPAL,1%2D19

ICEX. Francia implementa nuevas medidas a favor del reciclaje y la economía circular [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.icex.es/es/quienes-somos/sala-de-prensa/sala-de-prensa/detalle.francia-ley-reciclaje.news093202202

Khare K, Suresh L. Justice and sanitation governance: an enquiry into the implementation of the Swachh Bharat Mission-Rural programme in UP, India. Water Policy. 2023 Apr 1;25(4):379–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.187

Muigua K. Enhancing Environmental Governance through Law and Other Tools: The Efficacy of Kenya’s Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA). 2023.

Rondon-Jara E, Lipa-Echevarría K, Marchena-Barrientos S, Chambi-Quispe ML, Carocancha-Condori GJ. Comparación de las leyes sobre el consumo de bolsas plásticas en Perú y Chile. Producción + Limpia. 2021 Feb 10;15(2):175–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v15n2a9

Herrmann C, Rhein S, Sträter KF. Consumers’ sustainability-related perception of and willingness-to-pay for food packaging alternatives. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2022 Jun;181:106219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219

Received 2023-07-13
Accepted 2023-08-11
Published 2023-06-26