Simulation model for the evaluation of environmental policies through the characterization of air pollution in the city of Bogotá using system dynamics
Main Article Content
Poor air quality in large cities such as Bogotá, due to fixed and mobile emission sources of particulate matter,
negatively affects the social, economic and ecological systems of the city. Population growth is one of the main
causes that influence air pollution. Therefore, it is considered necessary to analyze the cause-effect relationships of
pollution, its sources and the effects on the population. For this reason, developing a model using computer tools
such as system dynamics, which can evaluate different environmental policy scenarios, will help to reduce pollution
levels and improve the life quality of the population. The methodology used was quasi-experimental with a
quantitative approach, divided into four stages, gathering information, proposing the causal diagram, developing the
simulation model and evaluating scenarios. Vensim® was the software used as the simulation tool. As a result, it was
found that highly polluting stationary and mobile sources cause an uncontrolled increase in PM10. It was also found
that annual conversion rates to clean technologies must be 10% per year or higher to achieve a 50% reduction in PM10 levels, in the medium and long term. The main conclusions were to determine that the use of simulation
technologies such as system dynamics are very useful to formulate more effective environmental policies. The
simulation presented the need for environmental policies to be long-term structural policies that do not vary
depending on the change of government.
(1). Afsar B, Elsurer Afsar R, Kanbay A, Covic A, Ortiz A, Kanbay M. Air pollution and kidney disease: Review of current evidence. Clin Kidney J [Internet]. 2019;12(1):19–32. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.u ri?eid=2-s2.0- 85066853379&doi=10.1093%2Fckj%2Fs fy111&partnerID=40&md5=f005debb6b 467ac19e18ad4845ef0e54
(2). Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Calidad del aire ambiente (exterior) y salud [Internet]. Nota descriptiva. 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. p. 1–8. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/factsheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-airquality-and-health
(3). Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). La contaminación del aire ya es una de las principales causas de muerte en el mundo [Internet]. OPS. 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. p. 1–2. Available from: https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?optio n=com_content&view=article&id=9089: 2013-outdoor-air-pollution-leadingenvironmental-cause-cancerdeaths&Itemid=135&lang=es
(4). World Health Organization. Mortality and burden of disease from ambient air pollution [Internet]. Who. World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. p. 1–3. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/phe/outdoor_air _pollution/burden_text/en/
(5). Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Corvalán C, R Bos, Neira M. Preventing disease through healthy environments: A global assessment of the environmental burden of disease. Vol. 259, World Health Organization 2016. 2016. 147 p.
(6). Ciampi MM, Da Rocha Brito C. Awareness of social impact of engineering: The task for engineering schools? In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings [Internet]. Safety, Health and Environment Research Organization, United States: American Society for Engineering Education; 2011. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.u ri?eid=2-s2.0- 85029124087&partnerID=40&md5=3cd3 386566c5ab4bdb996735fb5cd420
(7). World Health Organization. Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children. [Internet]. Clean Household Energy. Luxembourg; 2016. 130 p. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/file s/2017-06/9789241565233_eng.pdf
(8). Ministerio de Ambiente Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. Política de Prevención y control de la contaminación del aire. Vol. 1. Bogota D.C.; 2010. 48 p.
(9). DNP. Lineamientos para la formulación de la politica de prevención y control de la contaminación del aire. Doc Conpes [Internet]. 2005;29. Available from: http://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/ normativa/conpes/2005/Conpes_3344_20 05.pdf
(10). Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Mejorar la calidad del aire, compromiso del Gobierno Duque en el Día Mundial del Medio Ambiente [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/index.p hp/noticias/4327-mejorar-la-calidad-delaire-compromiso-del-gobierno-duque-enel-dia-mundial-del-medio-ambiente
(11). Secretaria Distrital de Ambiente. Informe Sectorial Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente. 2013.
(12). Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention. Stockholm Convention - Home page [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. Available from: http://chm.pops.int/
(13). United Nations. FAQ | Ozone Secretariat [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. Available from: https://ozone.unep.org/
(14). United Nations. ¿Qué es el Protocolo de Kyoto? [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 16]. Available from: https://unfccc.int/es/kyoto_protocol
(15). PNUD. Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible | PNUD [Internet]. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/ho me/sustainable-development-goals.html
(16). Sánchez E, Uribe E. Instrumentos económicos para el control de la contaminación industrial. Planeación Desarro. 1994;25(1):13–8.
(17). El Congreso de Colombia. Ley 23 de 1973. D Of [Internet]. 1973;1973(No. 34.001 del 17 de enero de 1974):11–3. Available from: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/ GestionIntegraldelRecursoHidrico/pdf/no rmativa/ley_23_de_1973.pdf
(18). El Congreso de Colombia. Ley 9 de 1979. D Of. 1979;1979(35308).
(19). Presidencia de la República de Colomba. Decreto 02 de 1982. 1982;1982.
(20). DAMA. Resolución 391 del 6 de marzo de 2001. 2001
(21). Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. RESOLUCION No. 1208 de septiembre 5 de 2003. 2003;(1208). Available from: http://portal.anla.gov.co/sites/default/files /res_1208_240610.pdf
(22). DNP. CONPES 3943. Política para el mejoramiento de la calidad del aire. DNP 2018 p. 1–79.
(23). Tamayo y Tamayo M. El proceso de la investigación científica. 5a Ed. Mexico: Limusa; 2011. 444 p.
(24). Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio M del P, Baptista Lucio P. Metodología de la Investigación. Sexta. MCGRAW-HILL. México D.F.: McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V.; 2014. 736 p
(25). Ballesteros EA, Montealegre EL, Zambrano DL, Ortíz EY, Arango CD. Informe Anual de Calidad del aire de Bogota 2019 Red de Monitoreo de Calidad del Aire de Bogotá RMCAB. 2020.
(26). Sanín FG, Reyes PG. Land Access and Peasant Property Rights: Walking the Labyrinths . Rev Colomb Antropol [Internet]. 2016;52(1):91–116. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.u ri?eid=2-s2.0- 84994486646&partnerID=40&md5=630e 4499a1cde1e24cbbae3932c51bdf
(27). Subdirección de Calidad del Aire Auditiva y Visual. Inventario de Emisiones de Fuentes Móviles y Fuentes Fijas Industriales - año 2018 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.movilidadbogota.gov.co/we b/sites/default/files/Noticias/10-03- 2020/inventario_de_emisiones_2018_ver sion_enero_2020.pdf
(28). Universidad de los Andes, Camara de Comercio de Bogotá. Observatorio de Movilidad. 2009.
(29). Movilidad SD de. Descarga el documento completo y las bases de datos en www.simur.gov.co. 2017;219.
(30). Transmilenio S.A. Transmilenio en cifras. No. 34, Transmilenio. 2018.
(31). TRANSMILENIO S.A. TRANSMILENIO S.A. Diciembre 2018 Informe No. 55. 2018;(55).
(32). Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente. Información detallada del indicador » Observatorio Ambiental de Bogotá [Internet]. Material Particulado Inferior a 10 Micras {µ} Promedio Anual - PM10. 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 29]. Available from: https://oab.ambientebogota.gov.co/indica dores/?id=d2ccd170-0178-11ea-8cc7- 8197075aabad
(33). Sánchez JM, García CA, Narvaez E. Problematic Of The Decision-Making Process In The Formulation Of Public Agricultural Policies In Colombia : Review Article. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev. 2020;10(6):139–46.
(34). Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Adm Sci Q. 1972;17(1):1–25.
Accepted 2021-11-30
Published 2022-05-26
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike).