Contenido principal del artículo

Autores

Aunque las compañías estandarizan sus procesos para obtener productos estandarizados con costos estandarizados, es necesario establecer en qué momento una variación en el costo con respecto al estándar se considera tolerable y cuando deben ser emprendidas acciones correctivas, preventivas o de mejora. El considerar valores tolerables con respecto a un estándar genera la idea que, en vez de ser un valor definido, un estándar puede ser considerado como un intervalo del valor esperado del costo, por lo que valores de costo que pertenecen al intervalo se consideran toreables mientras que valores fuera de dicho intervalo deben generar medidas de intervención por parte de los tomadores de decisiones. Este artículo presenta una metodología que permite establecer el intervalo de tolerancia del costo para un producto. La metodología utiliza un modelo matricial basado en la lógica del costeo basado en actividades que incorpora la simulación Monte Carlo para representar la variabilidad inherente en cada uno de los procesos. La metodología fue aplicada en un caso de estudio en el sector transporte obteniendo como resultado el rango de valores estándar el cual sirve como base para la toma de decisiones tácticas y operativas dentro de la organización.

Víctor Javier Jiménez Carabali, Universidad del Valle, Cali

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-5670

1.
Jiménez Carabali VJ. Estimación de los límites aceptables de tolerancia del costo en ambientes de incertidumbre utilizando simulación de Monte Carlo. inycomp [Internet]. 7 de junio de 2022 [citado 24 de abril de 2024];24(02). Disponible en: https://revistaingenieria.univalle.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria_y_competitividad/article/view/11551

Rodríguez AE, Pezzotta G, Pinto R, Romero D. A comprehensive description of the Product-Service Systems’ cost estimation process: An integrative review. Int J Prod Econ [Internet]. 2020;221(August 2019):107481. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.002

Brezigar-Masten A, Masten I, Volk M. Modelin-g credit risk with a Tobit model of days past due. J Bank Financ [Internet]. 2021;122:105984. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105984

Huang W, Mazouz K. Excess cash, trading continuity, and liquidity risk. J Corp Financ [Internet]. 2018;48:275–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.11.005

David RJ, Han SK. A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg Manag J. 2004;25(1):39–58.

Gosselin M. A review of activity-based costing: technique, implementation, and consequences. Handbooks Manag Account Res [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2014 Feb 26];(1998). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751324306020086

Vetchagool W, Augustyn MM, Tayles M. ISO 9000, activity based costing and organizational performance. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2021;32(3–4):265–88.

Nachtmann H, Needy KL. Methods for Handling Uncertainty in Activity Based Costing Systems. Eng Econ [Internet]. 2003 Jan [cited 2014 Feb 26];48(3):259–82. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00137910308965065

Costa TM, Chalco-Cano Y, Román-Flores H. Wirtinger-type integral inequalities for interval-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst [Internet]. 2020;396:102–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.08.003

Sarokolaei MA, Bahreini M, Bezenjani FP. Fuzzy Performance Focused Activity based Costing (PFABC). Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2013 Apr [cited 2014 Oct 28];75:346–52. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042813005752

Edjossan-Sossou AM, Galvez D, Deck O, Al Heib M, Verdel T, Dupont L, et al. Sustainable risk management strategy selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct [Internet]. 2020;45(January):101474. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101474

Rondeau M, Arès R. On the Test Particle Monte-Carlo method to solve the steady state Boltzmann equation, the congruity of its results with experiments and its potential for shared memory parallelism. J Comput Phys [Internet]. 2021;444:110590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110590

Datta PP, Roy R. Cost modelling techniques for availability type service support contracts: A literature review and empirical study. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol [Internet]. 2010 Jan [cited 2014 Oct 14];3(2):142–57. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1755581710000672

Erkoyuncu JA, Durugbo C, Shehab E, Roy R, Parker R, Gath A, et al. Uncertainty driven service cost estimation for decision support at the bidding stage. Int J Prod Res. 2013;51(19):5771–88.

Dean Ting P-K, Zhang C, Wang B, Deshmukh A, Dubrosky B. Product and process cost estimation with fuzzy multi-attribute utility theory. Eng Econ. 1999;44(4):303–31.

Namazi M. Performance-focused ABC: A third generation of activity-based costing system. Cost Manag. 2009;23(5):34.

Durán O, Durán PA. Activity Based Costing for wastewater treatment and reuse under uncertainty: A fuzzy approach. Sustain. 2018;10(7).

Ostadi B, Mokhtarian Daloie R, Sepehri MM. A combined modelling of fuzzy logic and Time-Driven Activity-based Costing (TDABC) for hospital services costing under uncertainty. J Biomed Inform [Internet]. 2019;89(June 2018):11–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2018.11.011

Esmalifalak H, Albin MS, Behzadpoor M. A comparative study on the activity based costing systems: Traditional, fuzzy and Monte Carlo approaches. Heal Policy Technol [Internet]. 2014 Nov [cited 2015 Jan 9];1–10. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211883714000835

Jiménez V, Duarte C, Afonso P. Cost System Under Uncertainty: A Case Study in the Imaging Area of a Hospital. In: Enhancing Synergies in a Collaborative Environment. Springer; 2015. p. 325–33.

Baskerville RL, Kaul M, Storey VC. Genres of inquiry in design-science research: Justification and evaluation of knowledge production. Mis Q. 2015;39(3):541–64.

Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 2004;28(1):75–105.

March ST, Smith GF. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis Support Syst. 1995;15(4):251–66.

Afonso PS, Paisana a. M. An algorithm for activity based costing based on matrix multiplication. IEEE Int Conf Ind Eng Eng Manag [Internet]. 2009 Dec;920–4. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5372875

Zimmermann H-J. An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res [Internet]. 2000 Apr;122(2):190–8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221799002283

Goh YM, Newnes LB, Mileham AR, McMahon CA, Saravi ME. Uncertainty in Through-Life Costing–-Review and Perspectives. Eng Manag IEEE Trans. 2010;57(4):689–701.

Mileham AR, Saravi ME, McMahon CA, Newnes LB, Goh YM. Uncertainty in Through-Life Costing–-Review and Perspectives. IEEE Trans Eng Manag [Internet]. 2010;57(4):689–701. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5432980

Recibido 2021-08-27
Aceptado 2021-11-09
Publicado 2022-06-07