Competitive Benchmarking with four companies in the pork industry
competitiveness pork industry profile benchmarking
Main Article Content
This article is the result of a research of the pork industry. One of the projects was the formulation of the strategic plan for the industry from 2015-2018, whose objective was to design competitive strategies to improve the companies productivity and address competition successfully. Applying an exploratory-descriptive type methodology with a qualitative and quantitative focus and resorting to primary and secondary sources. Tabulation of the results is collected in the competitive profile matrix -CPM-, which allows the graphing of the comparative values for its interpretation in the spider diagram.
Performance factors as well as the deficiencies of each one. Organization A has a better performance in: management and environmental protection, a deficient result in: quality management system, logistic distribution, food sustainability and management; B is successful in: production technology management, brand positioning, productive linkage, competent staff and raw material management, and shows an acceptable result in: management in the reproduction process, environmental management; C is successful in: management in the reproduction process, purchasing logistics, inventory, consumables, environmental management and food sustainability, however, it has flaws in: brand positioning and management, and acceptable in production technology, quality management, logistic distribution, productive linkage, technical and professional training; finally, D has an excellent performance in: management of reproduction
processes, higher in: production technology, food sustainability, productive linkage, technical and professional training of its staff; acceptable in logistic distribution, environmental management, brand positioning and management.
Performance factors as well as the deficiencies of each one. Organization A has a better performance in: management and environmental protection, a deficient result in: quality management system, logistic distribution, food sustainability and management; B is successful in: production technology management, brand positioning, productive linkage, competent staff and raw material management, and shows an acceptable result in: management in the reproduction process, environmental management; C is successful in: management in the reproduction process, purchasing logistics, inventory, consumables, environmental management and food sustainability, however, it has flaws in: brand positioning and management, and acceptable in production technology, quality management, logistic distribution, productive linkage, technical and professional training; finally, D has an excellent performance in: management of reproduction
processes, higher in: production technology, food sustainability, productive linkage, technical and professional training of its staff; acceptable in logistic distribution, environmental management, brand positioning and management.
1.
Betancourt Guerrero B, Franco -Ricaurte AM. Competitive Benchmarking with four companies in the pork industry. inycomp [Internet]. 2018 Jul. 19 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];20(2):87-98. Available from: https://revistaingenieria.univalle.edu.co/index.php/ingenieria_y_competitividad/article/view/5902
Authors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike).